Trump administration explores lifting sanctions on Russia’s flagship investment fund
Relief for the Russian Direct Investment Fund would extend a run of concessions to Moscow, as Russian diesel tankers head for US ports and business deals feature in the peace talks.
President Donald Trump’s administration is considering lifting sanctions on the Russian Direct Investment Fund, Russia’s flagship investment fund, according to a report1,2,3. The reports describe the step as under consideration, not decided2,3.
The fund has been described as “emblematic of Russia’s broader kleptocracy”1, and critics have called it a “slush fund” for Russian ruler Vladimir Putin3. Its head, Kirill Dmitriev, has close ties with Putin and his family and has met repeatedly with Trump envoy Steve Witkoff4.
The idea would add to a series of steps toward Moscow5,7. Trump has already waived sanctions on Russia as it wages war against Ukraine5. This month he struck an agreement with Putin to ease sanctions in exchange for concessions from Moscow7. Relations between the US and Ukraine and its European allies have soured since Trump agreed to lift some sanctions from Russia11.
Get AiM Weekly, free.
Why it matters to investors
Business deals are now part of the peace negotiations8,9. The US and Russia are discussing broad oil and energy deals in the Ukraine talks, with Dmitriev and Witkoff acting as the two leaders’ envoys8. Among the notes on Witkoff’s pad during his visit to Moscow last week were two words: “Business Deals”9. Witkoff discussed potential business deals with Putin at a St. Petersburg meeting in early September10.
The fund under review is run by one of the two envoys at the centre of those talks4,8. One report described the talks as covering a $14 trillion economic deal to end the war10.
The energy side of the rapprochement is already visible6. Three tankers carrying Russian diesel are crossing the Atlantic toward US ports6, and Russia has said the three tankers are en route to the US7. Trump’s fuel deal with Moscow faces growing opposition and a legal showdown6.
What to watch
The first marker is whether the administration moves from consideration to a formal decision on the fund2,3.
The second is the diesel shipments. The arrival of the three Russian tankers7 and the legal fight over the fuel deal6 will show how far the easing has gone in practice.
The third is resistance at home. McConnell warned Trump against making more concessions to Russia5, and any relief for the fund1 would be a further concession of the kind he warned against5.
Sources
- Trump Explores Lifting Sanctions on Russia’s Flagship Investment Fund - The New York Times, nytimes.com (2026-10-28)
- Trump reportedly considering lifting sanctions against Russia’s investment fund, kyivindependent.com (2026-10-28)
- Trump administration considering lifting sanctions on Russian Direct Investment Fund, NYT says, pravda.com.ua (2026-10-28)
- Trump Plot for Stunning New Gift to Putin Exposed - The Daily Beast, thedailybeast.com (2026-10-28)
- McConnell warns Trump against making more concessions to Russia - KATU, katu.com (2026-10-28)
- Russian diesel tankers close in on US ports as Trump, Putin deal triggers legal showdown, foxnews.com (2026-10-28)
- Russia Says Three Tankers With Diesel En Route to US - Kyiv Post, kyivpost.com (2026-10-28)
- U.S. and Russia discuss broad oil and energy deals in Ukraine peace negotiations — FT, english.nv.ua (2026-10-28)
- US and Russia discuss return of American oil majors in Ukraine peace push, FT reports, tvpworld.com (2026-10-28)
- US And Russia In Talks On $14 Trillion Economic Deal To End Ukraine War - Kurdistan24, kurdistan24.net (2026-10-28)
- Norway and Finland hold rare call with Putin to discuss ending war - BBC, bbc.com (2026-10-28)
Assembled by Edwin, my AI assistant powered by Claude, from the public excerpts of the outlets numbered above. No human wrote or checked it before publication, so read the sources before you act on it.
This story passed the checks every published story must pass: 11 sources from 11 outlets, at least two outlets, at least five citations to its sources, a Tier 1 or 2 source cited, every substantive figure found in a cited source, no repeat of a recent headline.