Investors doubt Anthropic can go public at a $1.5 trillion valuation after the AI selloff
Prospective backers say the AI developer may need a bigger discount, and possibly a later date, after a market rout and the election result hit technology stocks.
Major investors are increasingly skeptical that Anthropic’s initial public offering can proceed at its expected valuation after a deep market selloff, according to people familiar with the matter1. That expected valuation is $1.5 trillion5,8.
Expectations have already come down. Investors estimated a fair valuation for Anthropic as high as $2 trillion in early October, people familiar with the matter have said2. Investors now treat the $1.5 trillion figure as a ceiling rather than a starting point6.
Potential investors say the backlash against AI could also threaten the timing of the listing, and that Anthropic may need a bigger discount to secure commitments3. The developer of the Claude chatbot may be forced to delay the float after the Democrats’ midterm election gains4.
Get AiM Weekly, free.
Why it matters to investors
The listing has been expected to be one of the biggest IPOs of the year, by the forecasts of many market watchers10, and has been described as record-breaking in scale9. One analysis warned that a delay in the offering could have negative effects9.
The pressure reflects the broader market. The blue wave in the midterm elections has hit Anthropic’s IPO7, and concern over the valuation came as a global rout of technology stocks deepened4. Market turmoil has put the offering at risk9.
No valuation has been cut so far. The amended S-1 filed on 2 November still leaves the price range and share count blank5. Anthropic recently updated its S-1 with additional disclosures10, and its blank October revenue figure is central to the debate over terms6.
Investors are pushing for better terms on the planned November offering6. Their skepticism centers on whether the company can achieve the expected valuation in the current market1,8.
What to watch
The next amended filing is the clearest signal. A price range and share count would show whether the company has adjusted its expectations, since both remain blank for now5.
The revenue disclosure is a second focus, because the missing October figure sits at the center of investor questions6.
The third is timing. Potential investors have said the AI backlash could threaten when the deal happens3, and the company may be forced to delay4. Whether a discount is enough to secure commitments3, or whether investors hold the valuation at or below $1.5 trillion6, will determine how the offering proceeds2.
Sources
- Investors Skeptical Anthropic Can Hit Expected Valuation - WSJ, wsj.com (2026-11-06)
- Anthropic IPO Valuation Expectations Pressured After AI Rout - Bloomberg.com, bloomberg.com (2026-11-06)
- AI backlash could threaten Anthropic IPO timing, potential investors say - Reuters, reuters.com (2026-11-06)
- Anthropic IPO in turmoil as AI sell-off hammers valuation - The Telegraph, telegraph.co.uk (2026-11-06)
- Big Investors Now Doubt Anthropic Can IPO at $1.5 Trillion After the AI Crash, finance.yahoo.com (2026-11-06)
- Anthropic’s November IPO Plans Face Investor Push for Better Terms - Unite.AI, unite.ai (2026-11-06)
- The blue wave hits Anthropic’s IPO - POLITICO, politico.com (2026-11-06)
- Anthropic’s $1.5 Tn Valuation IPO On Hold? How AI Backlash Can Threaten IPO Timing & Interest, youtube.com (2026-11-06)
- AI Market turmoil puts Anthropic’s record-breaking IPO at risk - LIGA.net, finance.liga.net (2026-11-06)
- Want to Invest in Anthropic ? Here’s What to Know Before the IPO | Morningstar, morningstar.com (2026-11-06)
Assembled by Edwin, my AI assistant powered by Claude, from the public excerpts of the outlets numbered above. No human wrote or checked it before publication, so read the sources before you act on it.
This story passed the checks every published story must pass: 10 sources from 10 outlets, at least two outlets, at least five citations to its sources, a Tier 1 or 2 source cited, every substantive figure found in a cited source, no repeat of a recent headline.