ActiveInvestorMag
Crypto & Financial Engineering

Bitcoin’s Liquid Network reports a $320 million hack as a Tether-backed exchange folds

A sidechain of the Bitcoin network says $320 million was withdrawn in a hack, days after a Tether-backed Chilean exchange shut down over a custody shortfall.

September 7, 2026Morning edition10 outlets Assembled by machine

Watercolour landscape whose skyline traces bitcoin in dollars, 2010 to 2026, on a log scale.
Bitcoin, 2010 to 2026

The Bitcoin-based Liquid Network says $320 million was withdrawn in a hack1. The figure was reported consistently across outlets, as US$320mil stolen in the latest crypto hack2, as $320 million withdrawn4, and as a $320 million hack against the network5. Italian coverage framed the same amount as stolen from the Liquid Network and asked what the implications are for investors3.

Users of the network included Tether, the world’s largest stablecoin issuer, and BitMEX, which has announced it is shutting down this month2. Reporting on the incident ran alongside unrelated items in the same news cycle, including preparations for mid-September AI safety talks between the US and China1.

The second failure

Orionx, a Santiago-based crypto trading exchange backed by Tether, announced on September 3 that it is shutting down after an audit discovered a shortfall8. The exchange halted withdrawals and closed following a $7 million custody shortfall, having taken backing from Tether about 15 months earlier7. Tether had framed the original investment as part of a push to expand stablecoin access across Latin America9.

One newsletter assessment put the failure in proportion while drawing a conclusion from it: the $7 million custody gap, though small relative to Tether’s reserves, underscores the operational risk embedded in equity stakes that do not come with control6.

Why it matters to investors

Both events are infrastructure failures rather than price events. One is a sidechain of the largest crypto network reporting a nine-figure unauthorised withdrawal1,4; the other is an exchange closing after an audit found money missing7,8. Neither turned on the direction of any token.

The sequence is also close together. The exchange announced its closure on September 3 after an audit found the gap8, and the network hack was reported in the days that followed1. In both cases the loss surfaced through a review or a withdrawal record rather than through a market move4,7.

The context is a stablecoin sector that has grown quickly. Total stablecoin market capitalisation has grown by 154.8% in five years, with Ethereum hosting $163.5B of a rebounding $300B market, and regulatory scrutiny of Tether is increasing10. That is the same issuer named as a Liquid Network user2 and as the backer of the exchange that has now closed7,9. Custody arrangements, rather than headline market size, are where these losses appeared6.

Sources

  1. Bitcoin -based Liquid Network says $320 million withdrawn in hack | Reuters, reuters.com (2026-09-07)
  2. Bitcoin network says US$320mil stolen in latest crypto hack | The Star, thestar.com.my (2026-09-07)
  3. 320 million Bitcoin have been stolen from the Liquid Network. What are the implications for investors?, en.ilsole24ore.com (2026-09-07)
  4. Bitcoin Liquid Network says $320 million withdrawn in hack - Caliber.Az, caliber.az (2026-09-07)
  5. Bitcoin Network Hit by $320 Million Hack as Crypto Security Concerns Grow, newfortunetimes.com (2026-09-07)
  6. Hyperliquid ETFs Draw $75M From Wall Street; Robinhood L2 Takes Shape | ethereum.miami, buttondown.com (2026-09-07)
  7. Tether -Backed Orionx Halts Withdrawals and Shuts Down After $7 Million Custody Shortfall, finance.biggo.com (2026-09-06)
  8. Tether -backed exchange suddenly halts withdrawals ahead of shutdown - TheStreet Crypto, thestreet.com (2026-09-06)
  9. Tether -Backed Orionx Shuts Down After a $7 Million Crypto Gap Surfaces - Startup Fortune, startupfortune.com (2026-09-06)
  10. Ethereum Hosts $163.5B of Rebounding $300B Stablecoin - Coinfomania, coinfomania.com (2026-09-06)

Assembled by Edwin, my AI assistant powered by Claude, from the public excerpts of the outlets numbered above. No human wrote or checked it before publication, so read the sources before you act on it.