Gulf states refuse Iranian control of Hormuz as the UAE builds alternative routes
Abu Dhabi says its energy exports will not be held hostage by the Iran war and is constructing alternative trade and energy corridors.
The United Arab Emirates said its energy exports will not be held hostage by the Iran war1,2. UAE presidential adviser Anwar Gargash said Abu Dhabi would not accept threats to its energy exports or unilateral control of the Strait of Hormuz3. The UAE is building alternative routes for trade and energy in response to the attacks4, a move Syrian state media also reported as an effort to secure alternative energy and trade corridors5.
The wider Gulf position hardened in parallel. Qatar said Gulf stability can no longer be taken for granted amid the US-Iran conflict, adding that disruption of the Strait of Hormuz has broken the taboo on weaponising the waterway, and noting that no Gulf country had tapped into its reserves6.
Get AiM Weekly, free.
A protection question, not only an energy one
The pushback is aimed at two capitals at once. Israeli reporting described Tehran planning a new Hormuz corridor as shipping volumes plunge, with ships entering the planned zone facing sanctions and a new corridor with Oman to be signed soon, while Gulf allies question the reliability of US protection7. That second half is the part with the longer half-life.
The conflict itself remains unresolved. It was sparked by US and Israeli strikes on Iran in February and remains deadlocked, with a preliminary ceasefire reached in June having unravelled1. Marine traffic through the strait is already limited by the conflict2.
Why it matters to investors
Alternative routes are capital projects. When the UAE says it is building them4,5, it is describing pipeline, port and storage spending that will be committed over years and will not be reversed if the strait reopens. Fujairah and comparable outlets on the far side of the chokepoint become structurally more valuable, and the assets that depend on transit through Hormuz become structurally less so.
The second implication is political. Gulf states publicly declining both Iranian coercion and, implicitly, sole reliance on American protection6,7 points to a more hedged regional security arrangement. That widens the range of counterparties for energy and infrastructure capital, and it lengthens the risk horizon that investors in the region have to underwrite.
What to watch
Watch whether the Iran-Oman corridor arrangement is actually signed7, and whether more Gulf governments follow Qatar in describing regional stability as no longer assumable6. On the commercial side, the test is which alternative routes the UAE names and funds4, and whether the ceasefire framework that unravelled in June is revived1.
Sources
- UAE says its energy exports will not be ‘held hostage’ by Iran war | | AW - The Arab Weekly, thearabweekly.com (2026-09-07)
- UAE Says Its Energy Exports Will Not Be ‘Held Hostage’ by Iran War - USNews.com, usnews.com (2026-09-07)
- Live Updates: Latest from Israel , Iran, and the Middle East | The Jerusalem Post, jpost.com (2026-09-07)
- UAE says building alternative trade, energy routes after Iran attacks | Daily Sabah, dailysabah.com (2026-09-07)
- UAE moves to secure alternative energy, trade routes amid Iran conflict, sana.sy (2026-09-07)
- Qatar says Gulf stability can no longer be taken for granted amid US-Iran conflict, aa.com.tr (2026-09-07)
- Iran plans new Hormuz corridor as shipping plunges and Gulf allies question US protection, ynetnews.com (2026-09-07)
Assembled by Edwin, my AI assistant powered by Claude, from the public excerpts of the outlets numbered above. No human wrote or checked it before publication, so read the sources before you act on it.